Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] FS - It is time to pay to the piper . . .

Subject: Re: [OM] FS - It is time to pay to the piper . . .
From: Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 15:31:38 -0700
On 3/28/2011 2:55 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
>> If it helps I'll tell you that my Tokina AT-X AF 80-200/2.8 in Canon
>> mount is so big and heavy that it's one of those that never gets used
>> unless I'm no more than 100 yards/meters from the car.  :-)
> LOL, but we're not talking about the Tokina. The Tamron is a bit nicer
> of a lens and slightly better balanced.
>
> But still big and heavy.

I've not seen the AF version Chuck has. I have both the Tokina and Tamron MF 
versions. The Tamron is a tiny bit longer, 
but the big difference is that it's 30% heavier, weighed with caps and tripod 
mounts.

The seriously robust steel hood for the Tamron is also much heavier than the 
plastic one for the Tokina. The net result 
is that the Tokina seems not only lighter, but smaller, in the hand and on the 
camera.

One thing Bill didn't mention is whether the Tamron he's selling has the tripod 
mount. You really want a mount for this 
lens. I think at least a monopod is needed to use either of these lenses well. 
For me, it doesn't take long trying to 
hand hold them to get really unsteady. I've got some good shots with the Tammy 
on a monopod, though.

The Tammy mount is very hard to find. I suspect that's because of design flaws 
in the mount itself. There is slight flex 
in the mount itself. It's easy, as I almost did, to conclude that the flex you 
feel is because the mount isn't tight 
enough around the lens. Tighten down the lens attachment screw really hard - 
and the mount breaks.

The Tokina mount can't be removed, but is unobtrusive and sturdy. I believe I 
recall others here have said that the Oly 
mount for the 300/4.5 and 65-116 tube is easily adapted to work on the Tammy. 
That is probably superior to the original 
Tammy mount.

Gary's tests showed the Tamron to be a bit better than the Tokina. I've done no 
formal comparison, but the Tokina is a 
fine lens. The Tammy is more flexible, in that it can be mounted on practically 
any camera with their interchangeable 
mounts. My OM mount Tokina could, of course, be mounted on EOS cameras with the 
same adapter as for my Zuikos.

80-200 Trivia Moose
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz