I missed that one! Must be part of the kit for the new version 2.
And if the lens is flimsy, how's it going to go with that fisheye adapter?
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 11/03/2011, at 6:32 AM, Chris Barker wrote:
> You might be right about the flimsiness of the lens not being able to support
> a hood, Andrew, but it's listed on several Olympus websites around the world,
> such as:
>
> <http://www.olympus.co.uk/consumer/21693_accessory_lh-40_24012.htm>
>
> Chris
>
> On 10 Mar 2011, at 18:38, Andrew Fildes wrote:
>
>> Olympus seems to have decided that we don't need one. It isn't listed in
>> specifications or accessories for the lens on their product listing on their
>> web sites. Very odd. Further, this lens is not alone. I have the m.Zuiko
>> 9-18mm which does have the hood listed (LH-55B) but it's very difficult to
>> find - I bought mine online out of California. And it is expensive. The
>> Panasonic 20mm doesn't have one either. What is going on?
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|