I didn't comment on the original because I found the stark contrast
between shadowed subject and blown background hard on my eyes. I
literally had a hard time viewing it. Consequently, I heartily approve
of the Moosterized version. As with some things Moosterized they may go
a bit too far. This may qualify as one of those but I'm unsure having
to view it on the Krappy Kolor laptop.
Chuck Norcutt
On 1/21/2011 8:14 PM, Moose wrote:
> On 1/21/2011 1:59 PM, Nathan Wajsman wrote:
>> Another picture I kind of like from my test rolls from Puerto Rico
>> with the Fuji GW690. My father-in-law is very reserved and it has
>> always been notoriously difficult to take a decent picture of him.
>> I am sort of pleased with this one:
>>
>> http://www.greatpix.eu/Other/Sometimes-I-use-film/7590141_XFqsu#1163761726_56pBr-O-LB
>
>>
> The ol' Mooser thinks there's a great portrait lurking in that one.
> <http://galleries.moosemystic.net/MooseFoto/index.php?gallery=Others//Wajsman/PAWsnPADs&image=father-in-lawcra.jpg>
>
> I know your rules. Maybe if the F-I-L is too camera shy, desperate
> measures may be justified? This small version isn't quite right
> around the eyes, but working with the huge original should give great
> results.
>
> Moose
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
