Chuck
I did a tiny bit of post-processing, but only adjusting the exposure a little
(0.5EV at the most). I noticed the gross under-exposure on a couple of shots,
ones that I didn't publish, but I couldn't work out why.
However, the conditions were changing quickly, with bright sun reflected on
white fuselage as well as into-sun shots. I expect that the system couldn't
keep up with the rate of change.
Chris
On 17 Sep 2010, at 19:52, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> I note that something truly unusual happened with #6. #6 and #7 have
> nearly identical exposure info (same shutter speed, only 1/3 stop
> difference in aperture) but #7 is only slightly underexposed whereas #6
> is greatly underexposed. Did the camera really do this or is there some
> mistake in post-processing?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|