Ian,
I use the out-of-the-camera JPEGs most of the time. RAW converter is not the
issue here.
Wiliam
-----Original Message-----
From: SwissPace [mailto:ian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: dinsdag 7 september 2010 16:56
To: Olympus Camera Discussion
Subject: Re: [OM] Feeding the rumor mill
I have also mentioned this before, the question is are you looking at
the jpgs or raw files and if raw how are you doing the raw conversion,
This is where I found studio matched the jpgs which looked
sharper/better the other converters fiddled with colours, sharpness etc.
I am still straddled across systems, but soon will switch completely, I
like the canyon FF but miss shots due to exposure and/or focus, although
the focusing is getting better I still haven't fully figured out what
causes the metering to sometimes go haywire with the 35-80/2.8.
Canyon tele's are good but finding a wide angle to match the quality of
my oly DZ 7-14 will mean selling it - and then the E-3 and other lenses
may as well go.
On 07/09/2010 16:31, Wiliam Wagenaar wrote:
> I have the same feeling as Brian describes and also it seems to me that
the
> E-1 shots are sharper than the E-3 shots, although the resolution is
lower.
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
Geen virus gevonden in het binnenkomende-bericht.
Gecontroleerd door AVG - www.avg.com
Versie: 9.0.851 / Virusdatabase: 271.1.1/3092 - datum van uitgifte: 09/07/10
08:34:00
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|