Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Dark side - getting darker

Subject: Re: [OM] Dark side - getting darker
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 09:48:40 -0400
The new Canon 16-35/2.8 Mk II is reputed to be an excellent performer 
(unlike its predecessor).  It costs about the same as the Oly 7-14/4.

Chuck Norcutt

SwissPace wrote:
> I spoke with the photographer of the childrens charge conference we 
> recently went to in germany who told me most of  the german press 
> photographers  had now switched to nykon because of quality issues from 
> canyon. I am beginning to wonder if that wouldn't provide the best 
> compromise (like you saw). Lets see how I do with the caynon now though 
> I have the range 50 - 200 covered and for wide I can use my oly glass 
> with hyperfocal as my friend. If it wasn't for the 7-14 I think I would 
> probably sell all my olympus digital gear.
> 
> I will get a few days holiday soon to relax and hopefully take some nice 
> pictures :-)
> 
> 
> 
> On 09/07/2010 12:49, Bob Whitmire wrote:
>> Hey, that's a great lens! I wish Nykon would take a page from the
>> Canyon book and put out a couple of pro-grade f/4s. With cameras like
>> the D3 and D3x, noise isn't an issue, so not having f:2.8 really
>> wouldn't be that much of an issue.
>>
>> Enjoy the lens!
> 
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz