Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 22/5/2010: battle of ideas on the T

Subject: Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 22/5/2010: battle of ideas on the T
From: Chris Barker <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 12:02:05 +0100
Yes, I know, I know, Andrew.

And I did write as much in my post replying to O, Moose.  It makes no 
difference to my frustration at the poor sentence construction, grammar, 
vocabulary etc ... demonstrated by those around me.  My colleagues don't even 
know the difference between subject and object.

Chris

On 24 May 2010, at 08:12, Andrew Fildes wrote:

> Then prithee sire, may this poor wight regress and if that be to thy  
> taste, how far? Thou speakst not Chaucerian Engelisch I trow.

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz