I once had a broken C35... same thing? It looked to me not worthy of
fixing (even though just a solder joint on the battery box) so I tossed
it. Bad mistake?
Chuck Norcutt
Piers Hemy wrote:
> S3 is significantly smaller, and 54% of the weight of the S2 - that would
> sway my opinion. You might also find S3 referred to as C35FD, but in that
> case the manual might be in Japanese.
>
> Piers
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chuck Norcutt [mailto:chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 15 April 2010 16:41
> To: Olympus Camera Discussion
> Subject: [OM] Konica Auto S3, was: 90/2
>
> I tried to find an on-line manual for the Konica Auto S3 to find out what's
> so special about it. But I only found one for the S2. What's the
> difference and why so coveted?
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> Nicholas Herndon wrote:
>
>> Instead I was able to placate my GAS by buying a Konica Auto S3 for a
>> nice price. It's a camera I've been wanting for years. I love those
>> fixed lens rangefinders from the 70s, they are great cameras, and the
>> Auto S3 for me was the holy grail (well, that and a black Canonet
>> QL-17 GIII, one of which I saw recently that went for $130, which is
>> unheard of).
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|