Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Konica Auto S3, was: 90/2

Subject: Re: [OM] Konica Auto S3, was: 90/2
From: "Piers Hemy" <piers@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:35:35 +0100
S3 is significantly smaller, and 54% of the weight of the S2 - that would
sway my opinion. You might also find S3 referred to as C35FD, but in that
case the manual might be in Japanese.

Piers 

-----Original Message-----
From: Chuck Norcutt [mailto:chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: 15 April 2010 16:41
To: Olympus Camera Discussion
Subject: [OM] Konica Auto S3, was: 90/2

I tried to find an on-line manual for the Konica Auto S3 to find out what's
so special about it.  But I only found one for the S2.  What's the
difference and why so coveted?

Chuck Norcutt


Nicholas Herndon wrote:

> 
> Instead I was able to placate my GAS by buying a Konica Auto S3 for a 
> nice price.  It's a camera I've been wanting for years.  I love those 
> fixed lens rangefinders from the 70s, they are great cameras, and the 
> Auto S3 for me was the holy grail (well, that and a black Canonet
> QL-17 GIII, one of which I saw recently that went for $130, which is 
> unheard of).
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz