Well, the DP review of the 1.7/20mm is very positive--the only cons are lack of
lens hood and high price.
I have one on the way from Harrison Cameras in the UK, attached to a GF-1 body
which will also do nicely as a backup for my M8 (I have a Leica M-MFT adapter
on the way from Stephen Gandy).
Nathan
Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.nathanfoto.com
Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
On Jan 6, 2010, at 11:14 AM, Andrew Fildes wrote:
> http://www.dpreview.com/lensreviews/panasonic_20_1p7_o20/page3.asp
>
> And for the 17mm on PEN -
> http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/OlympusEP1/page22.asp
>
> Scroll to bottom in both cases for comparison graphic.
>
> Unfortunately the Pen doesn't correct the Pan but it's not extreme.
> At least I hope so 'cos I bought a 20mm from B&H and it's on its way.
> Andrew Fildes
> afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> On 06/01/2010, at 8:09 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
>
>> Where have you found that the 20/1.7 needs a load of correction in
>> software?
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|