Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] OMG! (not OM-G)

Subject: Re: [OM] OMG! (not OM-G)
From: Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 09:07:13 +1100
If that means it's tacky, maudlin, cliché-ridden, obvious,  
predictable, weak, derivative, fatuous, two-dimensional <g> and aimed  
at the lowest possible common denominator...yup.
Frankly, I get very angry when a filmmaker treats me with such obvious  
disrespect.
For me, the narrative is paramount.
Style must never become more  important than function.

Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx



On 03/01/2010, at 12:21 AM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:

> The "plot" is in-your-face as Andrew describes.

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz