Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] OMG! (not OM-G)

Subject: Re: [OM] OMG! (not OM-G)
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2010 17:50:07 -0500
Yep, it was all of those things.  But it was well worth the $5.75 
(senior) admission charge.  :-)

Chuck Norcutt

Andrew Fildes wrote:
> If that means it's tacky, maudlin, cliché-ridden, obvious,  
> predictable, weak, derivative, fatuous, two-dimensional <g> and aimed  
> at the lowest possible common denominator...yup.
> Frankly, I get very angry when a filmmaker treats me with such obvious  
> disrespect.
> For me, the narrative is paramount.
> Style must never become more  important than function.
> 
> Andrew Fildes
> afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
> 
> On 03/01/2010, at 12:21 AM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> 
>> The "plot" is in-your-face as Andrew describes.
> 
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz