Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(

Subject: Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(
From: Philippe Amard <philippe.amard@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:18:36 +0200
In short :
Shooting RAW is more or less like developing the film the way you want 
it to be.
Shooting JPEG is asking the first lab or shop round the corner to 
process it for you.

No printing involved here.
Ph


Chuck Norcutt wrote:

>Joel's statement about not needing to shoot raw when you have a live 
>histogram is correct... but only if your intent is to replicate shooting 
>slide film.  There are dozens of controls on ACR's conversion screens 
>and exposure is but one of them.  When processing raw files (basically 
>everything I shoot) I probably deliberately set no less than 1/2 dozen 
>controls and for some as many as a dozen or more.
>
>Perhaps this points to the source of the sometimes quite divergent views 
>on shooting raw.  Not shooting raw and not having extensive control over 
>the development process would be quite constraining for me.
>
>Chuck Norcutt
>
>
>Ken Norton wrote:
>  
>
>>>There is no need to shoot RAW in such a case if exposure
>>>is the primary reason for doing so.
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>Funny how some of us can manage to shoot slide film and get the exposure
>>right, but the moment we pick up a digital camera--gotta shoot RAW because
>>we can't meter to save our skin.
>>
>>AG
>>    
>>
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz