Re: [OM] 80/4.0 Macro resolving power?

[Wayne Harridge]

> Dawid Loubser <dawidl@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> 
> I am talking about 20x30in or so optical prints of quite flat  
> subjects, so no need to stop down m assively.
> (stretching the capabilities of 35mm, yes - but it's the sweetheart  
> format of Macro for film shooters)
> 

"Very flat" would be my thought.

I think you're correct about the 20/3.5, I believe the 20/2 was introduced 
because the older lens was diffraction limited wide open.

...Wayne

Wayne Harridge

http://lrh.structuregraphs.com
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/