Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Nikon V-ED scanner and software test

Subject: Re: [OM] Nikon V-ED scanner and software test
From: "Walters, Martin" <Martin.Walters@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:43:06 -0400
Thanks. I bought the V ED because I couldn't justify nearly double the
price for the 5000. Although discountinued, I was lucky to find a store
with a new one. I know that I'm limited to one scan at a time, with no
automation. I bought the optional film handler as well.

I've only started to play with Nikonscan. I've also tended to do all the
alterations post-scan in Photoshop. I've only tried a few old slides
(Kodochrome 64, Agfa Gaevert) some very old B&W negatives (1964), as
well as a couple of FP4 and Portra NC negatives. So, I'm still a rank
beginner. 

I found that the default settings seem to work quite well (comparing to
Costco/photo lab scans of the same negatives. ICE works very well. Not
working with conventional B&W means a lot of pos-processing to get rid
of dust and scratches (especially on the old negs). Such is life. 

I did buy Noise Ninja which helps with some scans, not with others.
Again very limited experience.

I suspect that I'll buy Vuescan at some point regardless. 

Martin 

-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Norton [mailto:ken@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 1:11 PM
To: Olympus Camera Discussion
Subject: Re: [OM] Nikon V-ED scanner and software test

>
> Nevertheless, I would be interested in your assessment of Vuescan and 
> its output relative to Nikonscan.
>


NikonScan is actually a very good program.  It does an amazing job. In
fact, when using strips of film (or entire rolls with the 4000/5000
models), it does a near perfect job of identifying the frames without
skewing. VueScan is quite finicky about that.  Loading the scanner is a
breeze--just insert the end of the roll into the slot and just stand
back and watch.  If you are scanning a 36-exposure roll in the
4000/5000, go do something else for a while.

I prefer NikonScan for most scans, (especially of negative films), but
rely on VueScan for the really unusual scan that just doesn't want to
work right or is of a grainy film where I can do the multi-pass or
multi-exposure scans.

My Coolscan V-ED does not natively support multi-sampling (same as
multi-pass, except it does the multiple exposures in one pass keeping
the image sharper), but the Coolscan 4000 and 5000 does. To make up for
this deficiency in the V-ED, VueScan gives us the multi-pass function
and combines the image in computer, whereas the 4000 and 5000 may do the
combination in-scanner (with NikonScan).

The noise-removal algorithms are different.  I prefer NikonScan most of
the time, but occasionally VueScan will do it better--depending on the
fault.
NikonScan does scratches better, VueScan does dust-specs about the same.

What I really like about NikonScan is that I can scan and process the
image within the software for curves, saturation, noise removal (GEM is
actually quite good--depending on the film) and sharpening.  I can
output directly to the finished JPEGs if I want with absolutely no need
to open the files up in an editor.

The bigger question is which model of Nikon Coolscan to get?  Unless
your needs are for 120/220 roll film, the choices should be limited to
the 4000, 5000 and V-ED. The 4000 and V-ED are the same speed, but the
V-ED includes
ICE4 whereas the 4000 is ICE3.  The 4000 and 5000 take entire rolls of
35mm film by passing the film through a slot in the back of the unit. It
uses the same roll feeder as the V-ED, but the V-ED limits the strip
length to 6-frames.  The 5000 is the fastest of the bunch (at least 2x
faster than the
V-ED) and has slightly better imaging performance.  Slightly. The 4000
and 5000 also take the accessory slide-stack adaptor.  Load up a stack
of slides and let er rip--and hope it doesn't jam while you are asleep.

I bought the V-ED because it seemed like it offered the best
performance/price out there and for that I have no doubts. However, I
personally should have purchased the 5000 because I've gotten to
shooting negatives so much and the speed issue is just that--an issue
for me. Whether or not it was worth the extra $500 was something I
couldn't justify at the time, but definitely could now.

AG
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz