Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] More on DOF and focal length (by Ctein)

Subject: Re: [OM] More on DOF and focal length (by Ctein)
From: Bob Whitmire <bwhitmire@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 16:46:05 -0400
The original construction would have been fine if it had remained in  
the present tense. Just remove the "did" and it sounds right.

--Bob Strunk White-mire


On Jun 27, 2009, at 4:41 PM, Ken Norton wrote:

> Hmm.  I shudder at the thought that "shake" would be correct, but I  
> think it
> actually is. "Shook" would have been a passive sentence. This was  
> one of
> those sentences that I think could go either way.
> AG (shaking in my boots) Schnozz
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Chuck Norcutt <
> chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Shook.  Hmmm.  You haven't needed a lesson in a long time.  :-)
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt
>>
>>
>> Fernando Gonzalez Gentile wrote:
>>> Skeptically, I shake (shaked, shoke ?) the lens very close to my
>>> ear, and I did hear something like little metal pieces crashing,
>>> dithering. S

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz