Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] More on DOF and focal length (by Ctein)

Subject: Re: [OM] More on DOF and focal length (by Ctein)
From: Fernando Gonzalez Gentile <fgnzalez@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 15:16:09 -0300
Very interesting .... what d'you mean by 'wet', Ken?

Now I realize I should go back to a thread I hardly understood, where I 
got lost at the idiomatic use of CoC.

Ctein's writing should add another item in his list of validation 
criteria: trial and error. (*).
Yes, I completely agree with him, and not with the article at 
<http://luminous-landscape.com/tutorials/dof2.shtml>.
During last year I faced this problem several times, specially in two 
situations where the d.o.f. scale marked on the Zuiko could be used no 
more: the 21/3,5 + 7mm tube, and the 200/4 + 2X-A ... trial and error, 
and d.o.f preview button. The latter, too misleading for the 21+7mm. 
Here's a 'trial and error' example of mine, the only one I happened to 
scan. Yes I did want its horn to come out in focus, IIRC I estimated it 
was at about 10 cm far, and focus plane is oblique.

handheld OM 2n on Auto mode, Zuiko 21mmƒ/3,5 at ƒ/16, 7mm extension 
tube, 49mm linear polarizer, Provia 100F

link to 1280, link to view on black.

<http://www.flickr.com/photos/fernando_gonzalez_gentile/2316283298/>

(*) now, this phrase by Ctein made me laugh out loud: "3. 
*Pragmatically*—pull out some of your lenses that still have depth of 
field markings on them." I had barely noticed the disappearance of the 
d.o.f. markings in glass for digital photography. Amazing.

Fernando.
-- feeling somehow happy since I'm figuring out how to get rid of 
mdnsNSP.dll
ever faced this one? ;-)
Seems I'll have to reboot, what a nuisance.

Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> No, the planned print output is what determines the acceptable circle of 
> confusion.  As long as the CoC is in the equation the maximum print size 
> has already been defined... except for Moose, of course.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
> Ken Norton wrote:
>   
>> Yes, but I think he's completely wet.  I learned from you, Chuck, that DoF
>> is a printed-output issue, not a lens-camera issue.
>> AG
>>     


-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz