Certainly the 100f2 is no slouch:
<http://picasaweb.google.com/zuikooh/Blur?feat=directlink>
It provides very nice and smooth bokeh. Next to that I really like
the 40mm f2 bokeh (and FOV),
maybe it is not the best, but I like it :).
Iwert
Op 8-mei-09, om 02:29 heeft usher99@xxxxxxx het volgende geschreven:
> With all this bokeh talk is it the Z. 100 f2 that has the most
> consistently smooth bokeh? Clearly foregorund/background distance all
> effect this complex lens character along with aperture shape, focal
> length, spherical aberrations. Highly corrected flat field lenses
> seem
> to have a heck of a time rendering nice bokeh like the Z. 50 f3.5
> macro. The F2 flavor does better at the price of some sharpness in
> the
> corners as CH points out.
> The Z. 135 f4 macro is no slouch though with close backgrounds the CV
> 125 SL apo Lanthar has a smoother rendering. I was suprised that the
> Z 85 F2 despite being a small gem (doubling as a mini macro kit with
> ext tubes) can have busier bokeh than I had anticipated. Longer FL's
> always seem to have an easier time, perhaps due to the physics and a
> narrower limited background to start.
>
> If one opened up the contest to non-Zuikos in OM mount on FF (film or
> dig), I think the CV 90/3.5 and the 125 both would be in the running.
> Mike
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|