Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> That's cool. Looks like maybe you built it from the eSIF?
>
Somebody else on the list built it. I don't recall at the moment who,
but I sorta think it was someone who hasn't been heard from for some
time? I downloaded it at the time and kept it in a misc OM stuff file as
a handy reference.
Moose
> Moose wrote:
>
>> Dawid Loubser wrote:
>>
>>> That makes sense. I've never used a 40/2.0 (would love one) but symmetrical
>>> designs generally produce great background blur, and the 40/2.0 is one of
>>> the few (if any?) OM Zuiko fully symmetrical lens designs?
>>>
>> The 40/2 is no more symmetrical than the various 50 mm lenses.
>> <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/tech/Lenses/SECT-HORIZ.jpg>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
