Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] 90/2.0 vs 135/3.5 for distant landscape

Subject: Re: [OM] 90/2.0 vs 135/3.5 for distant landscape
From: Joel Wilcox <jfwilcox@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:58:35 -0600
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Dood, I've never even laid eyes on a 100/2!  You're probably thinking
>> of my Sigma 19-35 zoom (which focuses in the wrong direction).
>>
>
>
> WHAT?  I thought for sure I used your 100/2 when we did the Porcupines
> Mountains?  Don't tell me I was smoking something.

If you were, you weren't sharing.  I'd have liked some quality time
with a 100/2.

Joel W.
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz