Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Flash frozen - was Risking the wrath of SWMBO

Subject: Re: [OM] Flash frozen - was Risking the wrath of SWMBO
From: James R <londonjames@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:13:41 +0000
Wow! That's a pretty ingenious way round the problem. And it's amazing  
that the delay works out to be just about long enough for the second  
flash to carry on where the first left off. Is there no overlap with  
overexposure?

James


On 17 Feb 2009, at 17:14, Ken Norton wrote:

>>
>> close to what I wanted was to use 1/500th and only have the flash
>> illuminate the top half of the runner, which looked alright as that
>> coincided with the horizon. I can't help thinking that I've missed
>> something and there's some way of getting this to work just fine -  
>> any
>> suggestions?
>>
>
>
> I've been experimenting with two flashes--one on-camera fired from the
> hot-shoe and the other fired via the eboy wireless remotes. The  
> delay built
> into the wireless is allowing me to illuminate the second half of  
> the frame.
> This is very camera and flash specific.  So far, I've got to cover  
> 2/3 of
> the frame before I ran out of development time.  My next step is to
> daisy-chain two eboy wireless remotes to further delay the second  
> flash.
>
> AG
> -- 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>


-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz