Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Chris Crawford - blog-posted photo of old Cadillac

Subject: [OM] Re: Chris Crawford - blog-posted photo of old Cadillac
From: Chris Crawford <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 15:16:45 -0500
Chuck,

Thanks for the info. I've updated my website to show the correct date.


-- 
Chris Crawford
Photography & Graphic Design
Fort Wayne, Indiana

http://www.chriscrawfordphoto.com  My portfolio

http://blog.chriscrawfordphoto.com  My latest work!

http://www.plumpatrin.com  Something the world NEEDS.



On 11/11/08 9:23 AM, "Chuck Norcutt" <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The car is a 1956 model.  Like a couple others here my first thought was
> that it was a 55 based on the "frenched" headlights (the lip extending
> over the top).  I didn't think that appeared until 55 as that was
> characteristic of the design of all the 55 American cars I can think of.
>   It was also on 56 cars but I thought that by 56 Cadillac had abandoned
> the little upward blip on the rear fender that holds the taillight.  But
> I was wrong.  The frenched headlights first appeared on Cadillacs in 54
> (they were the style setter I guess) and the taillights were mounted on
> the same blips from 54-56 except for the Eldorado.   The Eldorado had
> some stylish fins in 56 and set the style for others in 57.
> 
> The differentiate this car from the similar Cadillac sedans produced
> from 54-56 you need to look at the grill (small mesh) and the shape and
> location of the turn signal lights (rectangular, under the front
> bumperettes).  The 55 had a larger mesh in the grill and the rectangular
> turn signal lights were above the bumperettes.  The 54 is more easily
> distinguised.  It has an intermediate size mesh grill and the turn
> signal lights are above the bumperettes like the 55 but the lights are
> more inboard and are round vs. rectangular.  Here they are:
> 
> 1954  <http://www.misterw.com/Cadillac/54Cad2Dr01.html>
> 1955  <http://www.misterw.com/Cadillac/55CadCon09.html>
> 1956  <http://www.misterw.com/Cadillac/56Cad2Dr17.html>
> 
> 1956 it is.
> 
> Chuck Norcutt
> 
> 
> montsnmags@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> I've mentioned before that I subscribe to fellow OM list subscriber,
>> Chris Crawford's blog. His work always impresses me. However, this one I
>> thought particularly good:
>> 
>> http://blog.chriscrawfordphoto.com/?p=144
>> 
>> Also, since he asks the question, "Does anyone know what year it is?",
>> well, I figure there's a fair chance a few people here might have some
>> input to offer.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Marc
>> Noosa Heads, Oz
>> http://www.parknmeter.com/gallery
>> 
>> ==============================================
>> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
>> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>> ==============================================
>> 
>> 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> 
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
>> Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.9.1/1781 - Release Date: 11/11/2008
>> 8:59 AM
>> 
> 
> ==============================================
> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================



==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz