Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Chris Crawford - blog-posted photo of old Cadillac

Subject: [OM] Re: Chris Crawford - blog-posted photo of old Cadillac
From: John Hudson <OM4T@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 11:02:55 -0400
..............and to think that GM's shares are at their lowest price in 60+ 
years and is slated to go bankrupt before the end of 2008.

jh


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Chuck Norcutt" <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 10:23 AM
Subject: [OM] Re: Chris Crawford - blog-posted photo of old Cadillac


> The car is a 1956 model.  Like a couple others here my first thought was
> that it was a 55 based on the "frenched" headlights (the lip extending
> over the top).  I didn't think that appeared until 55 as that was
> characteristic of the design of all the 55 American cars I can think of.
>  It was also on 56 cars but I thought that by 56 Cadillac had abandoned
> the little upward blip on the rear fender that holds the taillight.  But
> I was wrong.  The frenched headlights first appeared on Cadillacs in 54
> (they were the style setter I guess) and the taillights were mounted on
> the same blips from 54-56 except for the Eldorado.   The Eldorado had
> some stylish fins in 56 and set the style for others in 57.
>
> The differentiate this car from the similar Cadillac sedans produced
> from 54-56 you need to look at the grill (small mesh) and the shape and
> location of the turn signal lights (rectangular, under the front
> bumperettes).  The 55 had a larger mesh in the grill and the rectangular
> turn signal lights were above the bumperettes.  The 54 is more easily
> distinguised.  It has an intermediate size mesh grill and the turn
> signal lights are above the bumperettes like the 55 but the lights are
> more inboard and are round vs. rectangular.  Here they are:
>
> 1954  <http://www.misterw.com/Cadillac/54Cad2Dr01.html>
> 1955  <http://www.misterw.com/Cadillac/55CadCon09.html>
> 1956  <http://www.misterw.com/Cadillac/56Cad2Dr17.html>
>
> 1956 it is.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> montsnmags@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> I've mentioned before that I subscribe to fellow OM list subscriber,
>> Chris Crawford's blog. His work always impresses me. However, this one I
>> thought particularly good:
>>
>> http://blog.chriscrawfordphoto.com/?p=144
>>
>> Also, since he asks the question, "Does anyone know what year it is?",
>> well, I figure there's a fair chance a few people here might have some
>> input to offer.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Marc
>> Noosa Heads, Oz
>> http://www.parknmeter.com/gallery
>>
>> ==============================================
>> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
>> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>> ==============================================
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
>> Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.9.1/1781 - Release Date: 
>> 11/11/2008 8:59 AM
>>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
> 



==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz