I'll check it out. I'm not a cat person.
Chuck Norcutt
usher99@xxxxxxx wrote:
> Yes, if the image did not degrade that would clearly violate the
> Heisenberg uncertainty principle as all the pixel locations would
> then be known. I have read on a Fred Miranda forum that there is a
> special custom setting on the 5D (gee Chuck, read the manual!) that
> can prevent this effect, but Schrödinger's cat then dies instantly,
> and not many people dare implement this mode. I will defer to the
> physicists on the list for more detailed explanations. Mike
>
>
>
> Wrong on the 5D. It doesn't help. All my images start to degrade as
> soon as they're viewed on the back of the camera. Those images
> never look as good as what I know I took. I believe there are not so
> subtle losses in as little as a few milliseconds.
>
> Chuck Nocutt
>
>
>
>
>
> ============================================== List usage info:
> http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies:
> olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG -
> http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.6.5/1618 -
> Release Date: 8/18/2008 6:51 AM
>
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|