Olympus-OM

[OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and r

from Winsor Crosby

Subject:	[OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and r
From:	Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sat, 19 Apr 2008 23:12:41 -0700

I wouldn't either. More like Geizhalsfreude, a Freudian term meaning  
curmudgeon joy.



Winsor
Long Beach, California, USA




On / April 19, 2008 CE, at 11:03 PM, Marc Lawrence wrote:

>>
>> To put words in his mouth, I don't think Andrew was condemning anyone
>> who already has them.  ...
>
> I wouldn't be too sure though. ;)


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and r, Jan Steinman [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and r, Marc Lawrence [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and r, Winsor Crosby <= [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and r, Andrew Fildes [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and r, Winsor Crosby [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and r, Andrew Fildes [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and r, Andrew Fildes

Previous by Date:	[OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size,, Winsor Crosby
Next by Date:	[OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size,, Marc Lawrence
Previous by Thread:	[OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and r, Marc Lawrence
Next by Thread:	[OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and r, Andrew Fildes
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]