| Subject: | [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, |
|---|---|
| From: | Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 19 Apr 2008 23:04:50 -0700 |
And the fact that they are dwarfish furblesnotzers matters not a whit. :-) Winsor Long Beach, California, USA On / April 19, 2008 CE, at 10:58 PM, Jan Steinman wrote: > I'm really enjoying the results from the E-3 -- couldn't care less if > it has 22.4% fewer furblesnotzers than brand "C" or brand "N". ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and r, Marc Lawrence |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and r, Winsor Crosby |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size,, Jan Steinman |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size,, Marc Lawrence |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |