Richard pointed out a good review ... For some other thoughts ...
If you are printing 20x30 landscapes I would guess you are using a
tripod most of the time. You could probably pick up an E410 fairly
cheap (I haven't had time to watch since the E420 announcement).
Perhaps the delay in buying the E3 would give a price drop that would
pay for the E410.
The wider zoom range of the 12-60 vs. 14-xx may save you the cost of
another lens. You mention a Zuiko 21 so it seems like the 14 wide end
won't satisfy you. The lens will probably keep you satisfied longer
than the body.
Good luck with your choice and upcoming trip.
-jeff
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 4:07 PM, <Bob_Benson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> (I'm planning both film and digital in Utah - it'll
> be interesting for me to see the differences. I shoot UC100 film). I
> will be happy to share the results of the comparison (pitting E-3 or 510
> against 4ti/21 et al see below.)
>
> My questions. (Premise: I'm a landscape guy and like to print 20 x 30's)
>
> 1. Except for the viewfinder (which I think is a very big deal, but I'm
> not sure it's a $1000 deal), will I see significant differences between
> 510 and E-3 assuming the same lens is used ??
>
> 2. Will I see a significant difference between the 12-60 and the 510 kit
> lens ? That is, would you put the 12-60 on the 510?
>
>
> Bob Benson
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|