Bob Whitmire wrote:
> .....
>
> I've been printing some larger images (up to the limit of the Epson
> 4800), and I'm impressed with what I'm getting. It's also nice not to
> have to resample images nearly as much. In fact, with a lot of sizes,
> I'm going down, not up, and the resolution actually is getting
> higher. With the largest images, (image area 16.5"x24") I'll use
> Genuine Fractals. I plan to run some tests on whether GF is worth it
> over CS3 at that small an enlargement.
Ctein has just finished a little three part series trying to answer just
that question over at TOP. Title is "It's Bigger, But Is It Better?"
Hmm, sounds like on of my titles. May save you some time and expense.
<http://theonlinephotographer.com/>
Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|