I got 3 of these. Anyone else getting double and triple copies of some
responses?
___________________________________
John Hermanson
Camtech Photo Services, Inc.
21 South Lane, Huntington NY 11743
631-424-2121 | Olympus OM Service since 1977
http://www.zuiko.com | omtech1 AT verizon.net
Moose wrote:
> Matthew Granger wrote:
>
>>I have only been shooting a few years, and chose the E500 mainly due to
>>budget, it has international warranty and the option to use my fathers old
>>OM lenses.
>>
>
> Brass tacks? It's more the photographer than the equipment that leads to
> great images. Lists like this tend to accumulate gearheads like me.
>
> The E-500 is rather pedestrian camera, with limitations for some
> particular types of photography, like anything that requires high frame
> rates, for example. It is capable of excellent image results and there
> is no reason to change unless you need to do something it won't or
> decide on another system altogether.
>
>>As I get more and more into photography, and my budget increases, I am keen
>>to move up the ranks a little. I don't want to sink too much into
>>accessories that would then need to be sold off second hand if I jump ship
>>to Nkn or Cnon. I would like to get something that has a good array of
>>second hand lenses, and will bridge the gap between enthusiastic learner, to
>>true enthusiast (with aim to do some part time commercial work). My LONG
>>term goal is to skill up and hope to move into it as my primary work – at
>>which stage I would want to be using a system that goes right up to
>>professional – which is how I got to Nkn or Cnon.
>>
>
> Again, and I haven't seen your work, so this is based on assumptions
> from your posts and questions, it sounds like you haven't come close to
> exploring the capabilities of what you have.
>
> And you haven't defined what type of commercial work. Product shots have
> a different skill set and require different equipment than journalism,
> than event photography, than fine art, than.... You get the idea. There
> are, for example some kinds of work where it is client expectations, not
> equipment capabilities, that determine what one needs. If you don't have
> the right, expensive kit, you don't get the job. But you are far from
> those sort of problems.
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|