Interesting idea ... if the lens relies on gyroscopes it wouldn't know
what the body was doing. If the body relied on the image sensor it
wouldn't care what the lens was doing. If they both used gyroscopes
you would end up with twice the correction needed. If they both used
the image sensor the response would probably overshoot then try to
overcorrect again ...
-jeff
On 6/15/07, Johann Thorsson <johann@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Just one thought: is there any reason why body IS and lens IS would not
> work together to produce an even better stabilization system?
>
> J
>
> > http://www.cameralabs.com/reviews/OlympusE510/video_review.shtml
> >
> > Click on the video, and about 4 minutes from the end (weirdly, the
> > time on youtube is counting down, not up) there's a very impressive demo
> > of what the IS does.
> >
> > -- dan
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|