Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Care of the 65-200 f/4, was: Buying a Tamron 80-200 f2.8

Subject: [OM] Re: Care of the 65-200 f/4, was: Buying a Tamron 80-200 f2.8
From: Manuel Viet <oly@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 01:15:06 +0200
Le dimanche 20 Mai 2007 23:42, Moose a écrit :

> It is again my recollection that there was at least one report of haze
> starting to return on an element that had been cleaned. As many sources
> have said that the damage can become permanent if not treated promptly,
> my conclusion that checking and recleaning would be wise/needed is one
> of logic, not personal experience.

It is my understanding that most haze problems come from fungus (don't know 
for that specific lens). Fungus is a pain to clean, but is generaly very 
sensitive to daylight. So I just leave my lenses uncapped out of their carry 
boxes, mostly facing a window. So far, no fungus, except for one camera I 
bought knowingly already infected, cleaned, and left alone : to this day, the 
fungus didn't came back although the lens is etched (gives a rather nice 
"soft" effect to pictures). One possible side effect of my method is to speed 
up the yellowing of some "radioactive" rare-earth enriched glasses (such as 
the famous pentax 50/1.4) ; but those lenses are doomed to this fate aleady, 
so... Another potential issue exists with RF cameras having clothed shutters. 
Unlike a reflex, thoses cameras have no mirror to block the sun rays on their 
way to the shutter, and this can create a pinhole in the fabric of the 
shutter by burning through. So the lens must be removed from the body if left 
exposed to constant daylight.

-- 
Manuel Viet

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz