You could be right, but it seems to me an expensive lens plus filter
is a very expensive mediocre lens. You might be better off to get an
inexpensive lens and risk damage.
Look here:
http://members.aol.com/olympusom/lenstests/default.htm
Put filter in your browser page search function and you will find 4
or 5 instances of adding filters of varying quality to various lenses
and how they degrade the resolution.
Winsor
Long Beach, California, USA
On Apr 20, 2007, at 7:16 PM, Ali Shah wrote:
> Naah...I am not stubborn just cautious I guess.
> However, I am not going to debate this cuz I know you
> are right also. The instructor teaching the photo
> workshops that I took a while ago also didnt believe
> in filters then again he also preferred to stick with
> only a 50mm lens! 8-)) Seriously tho..I nicked the
> element on one ZD 50-200, luckily Dell exchanged it. I
> will test the lenses out with and without filter.
>
> I have a friend who shoots with the Canyon 10-22mm and
> he seems to love his Hoya super thin filter (whatever
> version he has).
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|