| Subject: | [OM] Re: Zuiko 85mm F2 MC |
|---|---|
| From: | Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 19 Jan 2007 17:06:52 -0800 |
Walt Wayman wrote: > A 90/2 is bigger and weighs 10 more ounces, but how much does that matter? > And it does macro down to 2:1 without accessories and is a great lens. Feh. Macro on mine was not competitive. Otherwise fine, but what's the point? Extra size and weight for nothing. It went, 85/2 stayed. Moose ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Kodak finally came through, Moose |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Re: E-1 Firmware update woes, Jeff Keller |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Zuiko 85mm F2 MC, Tom Fenwick |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Zuiko 85mm F2 MC, Walt Wayman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |