Just enough bigger to make a huge difference, at least for me.
A little niggling thing. I hate the arrows on the bottom or on the
side that move every time the resolution changes. I usually click my
way through a gallery like this and hate to look for the arrow. Your
arrow is good, but it moves when your count goes from "9 of 19" to
"10 of 19". Not a big thing and if it is easy to fix...
Winsor
Long Beach, California, USA
On Jan 2, 2007, at 11:57 AM, Chris Barker wrote:
>
> Yes, and no, Bob :-)
>
> The front page of www.threeshoes.net is a very simple page made with
> RapidWeaver, but the /ang-abbey/index.html is made with Aperture. I
> did it to try Aperture out and it is very flexible (witness the
> larger images as a result now of Winsor's suggestion), but
> RapidWeaver has all manner of facilities for web albums. There are
> also many third-party providers of themes for RW and the
> possibilities are manifold.
>
> Chris
>
> On 2 Jan 2007, at 18:41, Bob Whitmire wrote:
>
>> One comment and one question, and then more later. I just got off a
>> 40-hour shift and have to put nose to grindstone for a while before
>> relaxing into the joys of photography.
>>
>> 1) I like. I'd really like if the images were a little bit larger.
>> The black background is super, and I like the tech notes. A good
>> design for the likes of this list, as it not only gives us something
>> to look at, but some tech data to mull over as well.
>>
>> 2) The question: Did you do this with that neat little authoring
>> program you told me about a few days ago?
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|