ML Archiv: [OM] Re: Thin UV Filter

Subject:	[OM] Re: Thin UV Filter
From:	Candace Lemarr <CandaceRocks@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 05 Dec 2006 08:50:49 -0700

Hi Moose...can you tell me exactly what you consider to be "at altitude"?
Thanx :-)
Candace

Moose wrote:
  My rules for color, 81 series for UV
> at altitude, 
> Moose
> 
> ==============================================
> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
> 
> 


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] Re: Scanner, (continued) [OM] Re: Scanner, AG Schnozz [OM] Re: Scanner, Allan Mee [OM] Thin UV Filter, Ali Shah [OM] Re: Thin UV Filter, Richard Ociepka [OM] Re: Thin UV Filter, Winsor Crosby [OM] Re: Thin UV Filter, Moose [OM] Re: Thin UV Filter, jking [OM] Re: Thin UV Filter, Ali Shah [OM] Re: Thin UV Filter, Moose [OM] Re: Thin UV Filter, Chuck Norcutt [OM] Re: Thin UV Filter, Candace Lemarr <= [OM] Re: Thin UV Filter, Bill Pearce [OM] Re: Thin UV Filter, Candace Lemarr [OM] Re: Thin UV Filter, Bill Pearce [OM] Re: Scanner, Bill Pearce [OM] Re: Scanner, Joel Wilcox [OM] Re: Scanner, Chuck Norcutt [OM] Re: Scanner, Allan Mee [OM] Re: Scanner, Chris Barker [OM] Re: Scanner, Allan Mee [OM] Re: Scanner, Chris Barker

Previous by Date:	[OM] Re: [OT] New camera..., NSURIT
Next by Date:	[OM] Re: Inspiration needed - totally on topic, Joel Wilcox
Previous by Thread:	[OM] Re: Thin UV Filter, Chuck Norcutt
Next by Thread:	[OM] Re: Thin UV Filter, Bill Pearce
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]