Tom Scales wrote:
> That was my point. There is no Intel compiled version for the Mac yet and
> they've said CS2 never will be.
Which brings up a thought or two...
I have no need for a Windows OS on my Mac, and will very likely never do
so, so why would I even want an Intel Mac?
My understanding of Mac's plans for the future mean they are never going
to offer a NON-Intel Mac again. They'll all have the Intel chip in them.
I suppose it doesn't matter ~ maybe ~ as if I do get an Intel Mac
sometime in the future, that doesn't mean I MUST install a Windows OS on
it, does it.
So, maybe I'm concerned unnecessarily.
Still, it sits uneasily on me.
I don't WANT an Intel chip, but all future Macs will [reported ly] be
supplied with them...
Dialog?
keith whaley
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chuck Norcutt" <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 6:29 AM
> Subject: **SPAM** [OM] Re: iMac for Workflow
>
>
>> Ah! Mention of Rosetta reminds me that I've been forgetting that
>> PhotoShop for Apple is written for a PowerPC processor and not the
>> Intel. I think I'm suddenly a lot less inclined to go there.
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|