Yup, I was very impressed by the specs too. Of special interest to me
was the addition of rotational corrections to the normal x/y motions of
the anti-shake system. Pretty cool since no optical system ala
Canon/Nikon will be able to do that.
Chuck Norcutt
Moose wrote:
>
>
> I'm curious about the K10D. Since he's not doing the E-400, I hope
> that's what Phil is testing now. On a pure actually useful feature
> basis, it stands out from all the rest in, and even somewhat above, its
> price/mp category. On paper, it's what many of us would like to have
> come from Oly. 10mp, body based IS, dustbuster, weather sealing, RAW
> development and some new and useful sounding exposure modes, including
> flexible auto iso with user set limits.
>
> If they got the sensor system right, this could easily be the choice for
> someone without a big investment in C or N system components either
> starting into digital or switching.Take a look at the features here,
> lots of really desirable stuff
> <http://www.dpreview.com/articles/pentaxk10d/>. And they have some
> interesting glass and can use oodles of old glass.
>
> If the sensor stuff doesn't deliver? Oh well, another boat anchor. But
> if I were looking to switch from the E-series, I wouldn't jump before
> seeing what the K10D can do.
>
> Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|