Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Zuiko 35-80mm f2.8

Subject: [OM] Re: Zuiko 35-80mm f2.8
From: John Hermanson <omtech1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 08:56:15 -0400
Exactly, when I saw the screws, I thought it was the rear element.

___________________________________
John Hermanson
Camtech Photo Services, Inc.
21 South Lane, Huntington NY 11743
631-424-2121 | Olympus OM Service since 1977
http://www.zuiko.com  |  omtech1 AT verizon.net


ScottGee1 wrote:
> I bought my C@non 70~200 f/2.8 from the agent that services and sells
> used gear for the L.A. Times.  It has a lot of cosmetic wear and the
> front element has scratches and marks.  Doesn't prevent it from making
> very fine pix even wide open.
> 
> In my experience, rear element damage seems to make more impact on
> images, especially wide angles.  In fact, when I first looked at the
> pic Graham provided, I thought it was the *rear* element.  Can't
> recall another lens that has screws up front like that.
> 
> In any case, I'd prefer to own a lens with some scratches than one with haze.
> 
> Sorry I can't help with value.  Your best bet is to find someone who
> has enough experience to know it won't affect pix and is willing to
> pay a price with which you're comfortable.  Now where could you
> advertise to a crowd of knowledgeable OM users . . . ?
> 
> ;o)
> 
> ScottGee1
> 
> On 9/25/06, Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>>As Walt said it amounts to nothing as to lens performance but probably
>>lots on monetary value.  Probably enough to warrant asking John or Clint
>>if they have a spare front element anymore and what it will cost.  Maybe
>>even an exchange deal.  Someone somewhere has a real beater with a front
>>element in much, much, much worse condition than this.  And it's
>>probably still taking great pictures.
>>
>>Chuck Norcutt
>>
>>GeeBee wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I have one of the above and intend selling it (to get out of debt not into
>>>digital) so I gave it a detailed inspection to accurately describe its
>>>condition. Horror of horrors there is a scratch on the front element. I
>>>cannot believe that I would miss something like that when I bought it and I
>>>know I have done nothing to cause it since owning it. The only explanation
>>>that I can think of is that the local repair shop must have done it when
>>>they remedied the loss of click stops on the aperture ring a short time
>>>after I got it.
>>>
>>>The scratch can be seen at about the 4 o'clock position on the shot below
>>>and my question is can anyone hazard a guess at what kind of beating I am
>>>going to take on its value? I am primed for wisecracks as well as sensible
>>>advice :-)
>>>
>>>http://www.geebeephoto.com/2006/Temp_03.htm
>>>
>>>--Graham
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>==============================================
>>>List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
>>>List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>==============================================
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>==============================================
>>List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
>>List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>>==============================================
>>
> 
> 
> ==============================================
> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
> 
> 


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz