Probably the latter. My wife is on my case all the time because I
almost never print any of our personal photos of kids and grandkids.
Chuck Norcutt
ScottGee1 wrote:
> Fun! Nailed to a tree. Yeah, that's a common problem. LOL!!
>
> They missed the most brutal test of all -- formatting a card in one
> camera, writing some pix to it then inadvertently using that card in a
> different model camera from the same manufacturer. Don't ask me how I
> know about this . . .
>
> The other interesting factoid to emerge from that article is "Around
> eight out of 10 digital pictures are thought to never make it into
> printed form at all." Wonder if that's based on the tendency to shoot
> a lot more pix because "they don't cost anything" or if people are
> satisfied by seeing pix on screens -- ranging from LCDs on the backs
> of cams to computer displays to televisions and projectors.
>
> ScottGee1
>
> On 9/14/06, Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>Wish I could find it but someone did a test a few years ago between a
>>CF and a microdisk that included dropping, freezing, heating and
>>other tortures. Eventually they nailed them to a tree.
>>
>>Found it:
>>
>>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/3939333.stm
>>
>>Winsor
>>Long Beach, CA
>>USA
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|