Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] OT Cinema - was RE: Re: Before responding

Subject: [OM] OT Cinema - was RE: Re: Before responding
From: "Jeff Keller" <jrk_om@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 16:30:01 -0700
California doesn't have to pay for US patents?

"Edison believed that he had a monopoly position on moving pictures, as he
was the only one with a camera. Two Greek entrepreneurs called upon Robert
Paul, a British electrician and scientific instrument maker of Hatton
garden, London.They asked him to build a number of replicas of a kinetoscope
that they had acquired. To his amazement, he found that Edison had not
patented this invention in Britain, and he went on to produce a number on
his own account."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_cinema



-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Manuel Viet


Le vendredi 21 Juillet 2006 23:49, keith_w a écrit :
> Manuel Viet wrote:

A:
1) because in CA, you didn't had to pay for Edison patent on the cineamera.
-- 
Manuel Viet
==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz