Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: [OM-D] PMA 2006 Olympus info?

Subject: [OM] Re: [OM-D] PMA 2006 Olympus info?
From: Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2006 19:48:52 -0800
Marc Lawrence wrote:

>If it wasn't for the contradictory reports, I think I'd be looking
>at the Sigma 30/1.4 at this very moment for the C*non, to give me
>that same focal length at least. I've a magazine to catch up on
>(the UK's 'Black & White Photography', one of two photo mag's I
>regulary buy) that has a review of it.
>  
>
Perhaps you would be so kind as to pass on a summary of the results?

>My experience with the New Year's Day pictures using the Zuiko 35/2.8
>wasn't good. I just can't use the lens well. Couple that with getting
>development done at a recommended store in the city that, I noticed when
>I got the photos back, had written incorrectly "400"-speed on the
>development slip (I don't know enough about development to know if
>it is developed differently, and what affect this would have had), and
>gave me all my prints in a muddy-brown black & white (it was 200-speed
>colour print "consumer" film).
>
Doesnt' matter what they write on it, all C-41 processing is the same. 
Have you looked at the negs? It's entirely possible that the failure was 
in printing and the negs are fine. 50-50 chances, I suppose.

Moose


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz