Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: 14-45mm vs 50mm 3.5 macro

Subject: [OM] Re: 14-45mm vs 50mm 3.5 macro
From: Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 07:08:33 +1100
The lens was brand new, straight out of the kit packaging.
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pbase.com/afildes


On 10/02/2006, at 3:06 AM, Jeff Keller wrote:

>
> I agree ... Andrew you were given a very poor lens.
>
> The barrel distortion at the wide end of the 14-45 bothers me so  
> I've used
> the 14-54 much more, but the quality of the 14-45 is otherwise very  
> good.
> I'm surprised your image looks so muddy. Normally I would think  
> that would
> be caused by flare but I don't see how abusive handeling would  
> cause a lens
> to have more flare unless the glass looked like it had been cleaned  
> with
> sandpaper.
>
> -jeff
>
> ----Original Message Follows----
> From: swisspace <swisspace@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> looks like you have a bad example, I have had two and they have both
> been okay, in fact I thought it was the 14-54 which was more prone to
> quality issues. It's just a good job we have our old om zuiko's ;-)
>
>
>
>> The kit lens is not only soft but looks muddy as well.
>> AndrewF
>>
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>



==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz