Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: 14-45mm vs 50mm 3.5 macro

Subject: [OM] Re: 14-45mm vs 50mm 3.5 macro
From: Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 07:00:54 +1100
Nope. It had to deal with it's 'normal shooting conditions'.
If it can't hit the point on that target, then it's no bloody good,  
right?
I had similar problems with the 17.5-45mm kit lens with the E500.
I'm used to better.
AndrewF


On 09/02/2006, at 11:30 PM, Jez Cunningham wrote:

>
> Phew/yuck!
> (Did you manually focus (B-mode) the bloody kit lens too?)
> br
> jez
>
>
> On 2/9/06, Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>
>> Yeah, I know it's not fair but I really wanted to see what the E-330
>> sensor could do and so put the old OM 50mm f3.5 macro in B-mode
>> against the bloody kit lens. Now, you tell me. I would have liked to
>> try the DZ 50/2 but it wasn't available.
>> http://www.pbase.com/afildes/image/55877883
>> http://www.pbase.com/afildes/image/55877884
>> Available light, tripod, 200 ISO, around 1/8 sec. They are both a
>> crop from the centre and about 50% of the original image area.
>> B-mode is slow but with the 10X magnification focus check it is
>> accurate.
>> The kit lens is not only soft but looks muddy as well.
>> AndrewF
>>
>>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz