Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Woohoo! It's here!!!

Subject: [OM] Re: Woohoo! It's here!!!
From: alfredo pagliano <alfredo_pag@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 18:26:40 +0200
and, oh!

By the way, looking tru' the viewfinder of my 100 USD OM-2n, with 50 
1,8 mounted after having been used for a while to a 350D with f/3.5 as 
the most luminous....

I had the impression of breathing again after a long aphnea....  :-)

Cheers

Alfredo

On Aug 19, 2005, at 6:16 PM, R. Jackson wrote:

>
> Yeah, but I don't own any Zuiko Digital lenses. ;-)
>
> I didn't figure that the kit lens was going to be a great lens. I was
> just saying that it covers a pretty useful range and that it's not
> overly bulky. You tend to pretty much get what you pay for with
> optics and you aren't paying a lot for the standard kit lens. I'm not
> a huge fan of C@non products in general, but my understanding is that
> they make some nice stuff at the pricier end of their range. God
> knows I see pros toting enough of it around.
>
> On Aug 19, 2005, at 8:49 AM, alfredo pagliano wrote:
>
>> A more fair comparison would be with a 14-54 f/2.8-3.5 Zuiko
>> Digital....
>>
>> Moreover, I've used both a 17-85 IS and a 10-22, and had a very hard
>> time deciding which one was the worst.
>> Let's say that if the 17-85 is a pechinese, the 10-22 is a chihuaua, I
>> mean, both are dogs, of some different species... ;-)
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>


        

        
                
___________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB 
http://mail.yahoo.it

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz