| Subject: | [OM] Re: ilford xp2 super 400 asa or 100 asa? |
|---|---|
| From: | jking@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Mon, 18 Jul 2005 12:26:21 +0100 (BST) |
> At 8:58 PM +1000 2005.07.18, Andrew Fildes wrote: >> > >>Which begs the question - the very non-OM question - does the 120 >>XP2s behave any differently than 35mm? >>AndrewF > > I have a roll of 120 but have not tried it yet.. I only picked up a bronica etrsi a few days ago :-) [sorry for the non om content in this email] James ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: ilford xp2 super 400 asa or 100 asa?, Andrew L Wendelborn |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Fast B&W film?, Andrew L Wendelborn |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: ilford xp2 super 400 asa or 100 asa?, Andrew L Wendelborn |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Sigma 600mm mirror lens, Andrew L Wendelborn |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |