Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: E1 vs E300

Subject: [OM] Re: E1 vs E300
From: Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 14:46:51 -0800
Oops,sorry for the blank reply. Flying mouse out of control!

I downloaded those fine. for anyone else who downloads them, file 
extensions can get weird, at least on my machine.  With Netscape, it 
tries to add a .tiff extension,

IMG_4351.CR2.tiff, while IE proposes IMG_4351.tiff. Neither is correct. Perhaps 
it is because I don't have an app that tells XP what a 'CR2' file extension is? 

Anyway, after applying the latest CameraRaw update to PS, they convert fine. 
Exposure of -1 on the conversion centers the histogram. Certainly nice and 
wide. At 50% on my screen, they look quite good. At 100%, some areas look a bit 
'smeary'. It's going to take me a bit to digest, but it's worthwhile. Thanks 
for the opportunity.

My e-mail can take large attachments if no one else is interested.

Thanks,
   Moose

C.H.Ling wrote:

>>>I have a few test shot with the Sigma and 20D, it was not that good at the
>>>long end although at the wide end it is excellent. If anyone need the
>>>original 20D RAW just tell me but it is 8MB each.
>>>
>>Thanks for the info. I would appreciate receiving your test photos.
>>
>
>Here are two shots at 12 and 15mm, I have limited space in my web, tell me
>when you have finished the download and I will up another two, there are
>totally four files, or if your email can handle the big files I will send
>it directly.
>
>http://www.accura.com.hk/IMG_4351.CR2
>http://www.accura.com.hk/IMG_4352.CR2
>




==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz