I agree more with Jeff. I do think exposure could have been adjusted,
but then it's hard to tell from a scanned image presented on the web.
Highlights look to be a tad overexposed. Other than that, I think this
is a wonderful image. I do agree with Bill that there are lots of good
possibilities in this spot. My guess is that Richard explored it pretty
thoroughly unless his arse was freezing...
Earl
Jeff Keller wrote:
>These remarks seemed very at odds with my reaction. Made me want to go look
>again.
>1.) I like the feeling of depth that comes from the front center tree being
>well lite and brown, while the left background trees are in light shadow and
>have a bluish cast. This makes for an excellent picture IMO.
>2.) The waves in the water give a feeling of motion. It might work with even
>a faster shutter speed. I can't predict which would be best.
>4.) The inter-play of shadows and light on the snow and trees is a very
>important part of the picture. Getting lower to the ground would probably
>loose that. IMO
>.. as usual you can get almost exactly opposite opinions.
>Great pictures Richard!
>-jeff
>
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|