Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Reflexe Numerique - French review of 4/3 and Evolt/E300

Subject: [OM] Re: Reflexe Numerique - French review of 4/3 and Evolt/E300
From: "John Hermanson" <omtech@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 10:14:56 -0500
The 14-45mm by itself is still a $250 item.

John Hermanson
Camtech Photo Services, Inc.
21 South Lane, Huntington, NY, 11743-4714,
631-424-2121, www.zuiko.com
Olympus OM Service since 1977
<:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:>
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Walt Wayman" <hiwayman@xxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2005 1:41 PM
Subject: [OM] Re: Reflexe Numerique - French review of 4/3 and Evolt/E300


> That's exactly my main gripe and the reason I've come to a resoundingly 
> conclusive tentative probably maybe "No" about buying one.  If you replace 
> the cheapie lens with the better one, what the heck do you do with the 
> cheapie?  Sell it for $5 on *Bay as a paperweight?
>
> Walt
>
> --
> "Anything more than 500 yards from
> the car just isn't photogenic." -- 
> Edward Weston
>
> -------------- Original message ----------------------
> From: "Jez Cunningham" <jez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> [snip]
>>They would have liked to see the body available alone so that the
>> more professional 14-54mm f/2.8-3.5 could have been substituted for the 
>> 14-45mm
>> f3.5-5.6 zoom.
> [snip]



==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz