B&H lists the body alone as "New" "Price To Be Announced."
Winsor
Long Beach, California, USA
On Jan 16, 2005, at 10:41 AM, Walt Wayman wrote:
> That's exactly my main gripe and the reason I've come to a
> resoundingly conclusive tentative probably maybe "No" about buying
> one. If you replace the cheapie lens with the better one, what the
> heck do you do with the cheapie? Sell it for $5 on *Bay as a
> paperweight?
>
> Walt
>
> --
> "Anything more than 500 yards from
> the car just isn't photogenic." --
> Edward Weston
>
> -------------- Original message ----------------------
> From: "Jez Cunningham" <jez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> [snip]
>> They would have liked to see the body available alone so that the
>> more professional 14-54mm f/2.8-3.5 could have been substituted for
>> the 14-45mm
>> f3.5-5.6 zoom.
> [snip]
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|