ML Archiv: [OM] Re: tamron 80 - 200 LD F 2.8 reasonable price?

Subject:	[OM] Re: tamron 80 - 200 LD F 2.8 reasonable price?
From:	Jim Couch <jamesbcouch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 17 Dec 2004 14:38:26 -0800

If you have to ask...

Jim Couch

Walt Wayman wrote:

>A 'holic?  The fact you asked means you aren't sure, which means you probably 
>are.
>
>Walt
>
>  
>

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] Re: tamron 80 - 200 LD F 2.8 reasonable price?, (continued) Message not available [OM] Re: tamron 80 - 200 LD F 2.8 reasonable price?, jking [OM] Re: tamron 80 - 200 LD F 2.8 reasonable price?, Donald MacDonald [OM] Re: tamron 80 - 200 LD F 2.8 reasonable price?, Jamie Costello [OM] Re: tamron 80 - 200 LD F 2.8 reasonable price?, jking [OM] SHIFTY questions, jking [OM] Re: SHIFTY questions, Andrew Gullen [OM] Re: SHIFTY questions, Piers Hemy [OM] Re: tamron 80 - 200 LD F 2.8 reasonable price?, Jim Brokaw [OM] Re: tamron 80 - 200 LD F 2.8 reasonable price?, jking [OM] Re: tamron 80 - 200 LD F 2.8 reasonable price?, Jim Brokaw [OM] Re: tamron 80 - 200 LD F 2.8 reasonable price?, Jim Couch <= [OM] Re: tamron 80 - 200 LD F 2.8 reasonable price?, Walt Wayman [OM] Re: tamron 80 - 200 LD F 2.8 reasonable price?, Gordon Ross [OM] Re: tamron 80 - 200 LD F 2.8 reasonable price?, Andrew Fildes [OM] Tamron 35-105/2.8 - was this a fang?, Bernard Frangoulis [OM] Re: tamron 80 - 200 LD F 2.8 reasonable price?, Walt Wayman

Previous by Date:	[OM] Re: tamron 80 - 200 LD F 2.8 reasonable price?, Jim Couch
Next by Date:	[OM] Re: inkjet prints: how to avoid "layered ink look", John Wheeler
Previous by Thread:	[OM] Re: tamron 80 - 200 LD F 2.8 reasonable price?, Jim Brokaw
Next by Thread:	[OM] Re: tamron 80 - 200 LD F 2.8 reasonable price?, Walt Wayman
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]